第4章
《法律英语900句》章节:第4章,宠文网网友提供全文无弹窗免费在线阅读。!
法庭裁决被告犯有所有被指控的罪行。
法院已经做出强制履行裁定。
法院命令没收公司资金。
法庭对警察死因不明的裁决作了记录。
法院裁定为意外事故死亡。
她按法院给她的权力做事。
六周后法院命令才生效。
法院要求了解案件详细的背景情况。
法院让被告拿出他不应该被监禁的充足的理由。
法院驳回诉松。
法院把被告送交答辩状的时间延长了14天。
该法庭遵循1926年的先例。
法院准予公司延缓两同执行。
法院听取了指纹专家的证词。
法院裁定无案件事实可辩。
该法院无权审理该案件。
在司法复审后,该法院命令调取案卷,
撤销了少年法院的裁决.
法院命令执行行官扣押他的财产,
因为他没交纳罚款。
法院命令理审此案。
法院的意见是该案应在双方当事人在场的情况下尽快审理.
法院对无罪抗辩作了记载。
法院持有这样的观点,即被告的答辩是模棱两可的。
法庭将对证据的可采性进行裁决。
刑事法院命令治安官重新审理该案。
法庭的裁决与法官书记官的意见相悖。
强制令的筌发的属于法院的自由裁量权。
法庭裁决不予任何损害赔偿。
法庭必须公正执法。
法庭的裁决确立了一个先例。
犯罪
犯罪是刑法规定范畴的应应承担刑事责任的行为.
犯罪是具有社会危害性应当受到刑罚处罚的行为.
罪包含所有违背正确理性的行为、言词和意志.
罪行越严重,情节越是难以置信的,
证据的尺度越应严格.
没有主观过错的行为不会令人行为人有责.
醉酒者犯罪应负刑事责任.
向未成年人出售烈性酒,是商店故意犯罪法.
过失犯罪,法律有规定的才负刑事责任。
故意犯罪,应当负刑事责任。
罪犯都是病态的,他们应该是病人,而不是囚犯.
凡不能被证明有罪者均是无鼙的.
轻易赦免罪过,实际是鼓励犯罪。
予杀人者以应得之罪。
可恨的是罪行而非罪人。
他犯了重罪。
在讯问中他供认了犯罪。
他否认当谋杀发生时他在住宅内.
他承认犯有非预谋杀人罪而非谋杀罪.
他试图确定自已无罪。
他洗心革面,重新做人.
他被指控犯有谋杀罪。
他因在街在有妨害治安行为而被捕。
他因涉嫌同谋犯罪被捕。
他被带到法庭并被指控犯有强奸罪。
他被指控非法习卖毒品。
他被洗去所有指控罪名。
军事法庭判他有罪并判他坐牢。
他被判严重玩忽职守。
他被指控犯有谋杀罪。
他被指控犯罪侵占信托财产。
他因侵占资产被监六个月。
对犯罪的仁慈是对人民的残忍。
重复诽谤是一种犯罪行为。
与16岁以下的女孩性交是一种犯罪行为.
因犯有敲诈罪她被送进监狱。
犯罪是预谋好的。
该公司犯有逃避增值税规定罪。
嫌疑犯被拘留。
嫌疑犯在犯罪现场被捕。
偷窃属于轻罪。
公民权利
平等者之间无支配权可言。
凡违犯罪基本人权的法律都是无理和专制的。
公民依法享有财产继承权。
每个人都有自固有的权利,任何人不得侵犯他人的权利.
每个人都享有言论自由。
法律面前人人平等。
每个人的生命权利都应受法律保护。
先在权利优先。
他没有代表我们做事的授权。
他是此财产的合法主张人。
无救济无权利。
没有无义务的权利。
无实物交付便无权利转移。
权利的转让既要求有接受者的意志,
也要求有转让者的意志.
公民自由的精髓在于一旦受到伤害,
每个公民都有请求法律保护的权利.
侵犯此种权益就是违法过错并导致法律权利的产生.
该权利无法通过司法程序得到。
某些权利有时被称为不完全权利,
它们为法律所认可但却不能直接予以执行.
自由是指在法律范围内行为的权利。
权利是一种可要求他人履行.
作为或不作为的可予以强制执行的主张.
Part 11 Company law
1.A company director owes a fiduciary duty to the company.
2.A company is regarded by the law as a person:an artificial person.
3.An enterprise as a legal person shall conduct operations
within the range approved and registered.
4.He is director appointed under the articles of the company.
5.Prior to application for registration,
the share capital must be stipulated in the Articles
and all shares must be subscribed.
6.The chairman was personally liable for the company's debts.
7.The company has complied with the court order.
8.The company has fulfilled all the terms of the agreement.
9.The company intends to sue for damages.
10.The company is controlled by the majority shareholder.
11.The company is presumed to be still solvent.
12.The company is resisting the takeover bid.
13.The company's action was completely legal.
14.The domicile of a legal person or other organization
is at the place of its principal business establishment.
15.The legal adviser recommended applying for an injunction against the directors of the company.
16.The major methods used to reconstitute the company
are acquisition of companies and merging.
17.The profits and losses of the equity joint venture
shall be shared by the parties in proportion to their contributions
of the registered capital.
18.The resolution was invalid because the shareholder's meeting was not quorate.
19.The right to vote at shareholder's meetings
for the election of directors shall be observed.
20.The two companies have merged.
Part 12 Jurisdiction
1.It is a principle of first importance
that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.
2.Jurisdiction determines which court system should properly adjudicate a case.
3.Questions of jurisdiction also arise regarding quasi-judicial bodies,
such as administrative agencies.
4.The case falls within the competence of the court.
5.The choice of jurisdiction of a court by agreement
shall not violate the provisions of exclusive jurisdiction undr the law.
6.The court held that exercise of personal jurisdiction
must meet the requirements of due process.
7.The federal courts have usually interpreted the matters of jurisdiction rather strictly.
8.The jurisdictional amount is set by statute and is currently $80,000.
9.This matter does not fall within the jurisdiction fo the Hight Court.
10.To start a civil suit the plaintiff first picks the proper court,
one that has jurisdiction in the case.
Part 13 International law
1.A state alone can perform acts of sovereignty on its territory.
2.Being sovereign and equal to others,
a state has certain rights and corresponding duties.
3.Both sides claimed the other side broke the peace agreement.
4.Every state has the duty to refrain from use of force against the territorial integrity of any other state.
5.He claimed diplomatic immunity to avoid being arrested.
6.His passport is out of date.
7.Illegal immigrants are deported.
8.One of the most flagrant of infringement of independence of States is intervention.
9.Public intermational law has been regarded as a system of principles and rules
designed to govern relations between sovereign states.
10.The beginnings of international law as it is known today
are usually traced to the 16th and 17th centuries.
Part 14 Negligence
1.Did the other person act negligently?